Stocks

Duration

A fund’s duration can sometimes be a misleading measurement of interest rate risk if the bond fund has a meaningful weighting in convertibles, foreign stocks and bonds or derivatives. Haslem (2003) believes duration is a more accurate measurement when there are small interest rate changes. Duration tends to better reflect interest rate risk of portfolios of high quality bonds.

Previous Post
Unpopular Funds

Next Post
Indexing

Unpopular Funds

Fund popularity can be measured by percentage change in net cash flow over a stated period. Barbee (1999b) discovered unpopular funds had higher returns than popular funds from 1987-1998. Specifically, over 3-year periods, unpopular funds typically outperformed 78% of the time. In a separate paper, Ibbotson concluded picking funds that will outperform their benchmark is easier than trying to determine what investment style will perform best.

Previous Post
Expense Ratios

Next Post
Duration

Expense Ratios

Bogle (1999b) concluded 92% of return shortfall for active managers was due to expenses. Expense ratio shows the percentage of fund assets annually spent for overhead (i.e., shareholder services, rent, administrative salaries, etc.) and management. The expense ratio does not include trading costs or reflect any bid-ask spread and does not include any sales commissions or purchase or redemption fees. According to Zweig (1997b), management (advisory) fees represent 60%+ of the total expense ratio.

Previous Post
Currency Risk

Next Post
Unpopular Funds

Currency Risk

In general, a currency futures contract locks in the exchange rate between two currencies. A company in one country selling products in another country can eliminate currency risk by purchasing a sufficient number of such futures contracts. Currency gains and losses represent a “difference in exchange value of the foreign currency and the domestic currency between the time the investment was bought and time it was sold” (Barron’s, 2014).

Next Post
Expense Ratios

S&P 500 Sectors: Beta, Correlation, R2 & Weightings

Most of the information from Table 5 comes from State Street’s SPDR ETF website. SPDR ETF symbols are shown in parentheses. R2 figures are from Morningstar and represent fund categories; not shown are precious metals funds (R2 = 12) and natural resource funds (R2 = 77).

 

Table 5

S&P 500 Sector Stats, November 2015

 

SPDR ETF Sector  (symbol)

Previous Post
R2

Next Post
Currency Risk

R2

Barron’s defines R2 as a mutual fund term indicating “on a scale of 0 to 100, the percentage of a fund’s performance…explained by movements of its benchmark index.” For example, if the benchmark was the S&P 500, the typical large cap blend fund would likely have an R2 of > 90%. R2 can be used to gauge relevancy of a fund’s beta; the higher the R2, the greater the importance of beta.

 

Previous Post
Serial Correlations

Serial Correlations

For investors, serial correlation, also referred to as autocorrelation, measures predictability of returns from one period to the next. For example, if ABC returned 3% annualized over the past three years and then averaged close to 3% for the subsequent three years it would have a high serial correlation.

 

Next Post
R2

Previous Post
Beta

Beta

Beta measures market risk, also known as systematic risk. A 1992 Journal of Finance article by Fama and French, The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, shows past and current beta are not a good predictor of future betaat least when it comes to individual stocks. Fama and French suggest stock betas tend to mean revert; a stock with a past beta of 1.5 or 0.8 should tend to move toward 1.0 in the future.

 

Risk-Return Characteristics of a 100 Stock Portfolio

A 2004 AAII Journal article by Daniel Burnside, How Many Stocks Do You Need to be Diversified, points out even a 100-stock portfolio will have a high level of return deviation: “a single security selected at random would have an average tracking error in its monthly return of 5.5% from a cap-weighted index…even a portfolio of 100 stocks will deviate from its target index by an average of 0.60% per month for the value-weighted approach...corresponds to an annualized deviation of ~ 2.1%.”

 

Next Post
Beta

For Advisors by Advisors. Browse all Programs.